Page 73 of 357 FirstFirst ... 2363717273747583123173 ... LastLast
Results 721 to 730 of 3570

Thread: Coronavirus

  1. #721
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ambleside
    Posts
    6,160
    Quote Originally Posted by Graham Breeze View Post
    Even so the 4% includes Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester etc so I am quizzical how many in Ilkley (to choose a town at random) have had it when there have been no cases reported in the Ilkley Gazette, even though Ilkley is full of care homes (charity shops, fashion shops, restaurants and coffee bars - or at least was).

    Unfortunately this Wednesday will change that.

  2. #722
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cockermouth
    Posts
    154
    Quote Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
    Even When it is cold and miserable we ride past fishermen on the canal towpath who have faces like a wet weekend. I assume they prefer it to being home, so they are socially distancing the wife and kids!

    It’s comforting to know that the world is its usual self. What can be more normal than teachers unions whinging again about anything and everything. This case about going back to work. If you gave them 52 weeks off, they still would find something to grumble about. Probably the “ stress “ of being off for so long.

    Stress is a serious issue that will rear its head. It is rarely commented , and stats are hard to come by, but entrepreneurs ( not doctors or teachers) have a massive suicide rate. We all know some that have been pushed over the edge.

    Now government has taken the easy way out and made business pay 100 percent for corona virus, not a discernible penny from the public sector, ( the unions would whinge to kingdom come) there will now be a massive wave of business collapses ( many of them out of sheer spite not logic , like Virgin) and with it a wave of entrepreneur suicides. They will go largely unreported. They are after all, public enemy number 1: parasites in our twisted world of values.

    They are the most useful people in the economy, because without them there is no money for anything. But nobody will clap for them, despite the fact of that their paying for corona will last for years. The day they finally make a profit, they will be branded parasites again. Ignoring the fact they pay for it all. Not to mention the devastation of equities which will force many businesses to be asked to top up pension schemes.

    That was the most unfair legislation in history, when brown made business responsible for how his government trashed return in the economy.
    I can't let that bit of teacher / public sector bashing go without comment. As a teacher, about to log on to my schools home learning platform to mark work, set more work and deal with pupils queries, I find your post quite offensive and a little disappointing.

    We are not on strike, the unions are not 'whinging about anything and everything'. We are working within the limitations placed upon us by the government. Speaking for myself (and all the teachers I am in contact with have said the same) we would much rather be back at work and getting on as normal. The union are simply doing their job of checking that it will be safe to do so when we do return. Not just for teachers sake, but also the kids, parents, grandparents and the wider community who have regular contact with school kids and staff.

    If the government didn't have the advice that shutting schools was as necessary as the other measures, they would not have closed. The unions didn't shut the schools the Government did.

    Can we give the 'public v private' sector argument a rest? In a modern diverse economy, we all know one could not function without the other. The entrepreneur needs a literate and numerate worker, who is healthy and can get to and from work using the infrastructure provided. Don't forget, all the public sector pay their taxes (I don't know many teachers taking advantage of 'tax efficient' investment opportunities registered in the Cayman Islands) and contribute to the economy.

    If we went all the way down the free market liberal capitalism road, how do you think we would be faring now with the current crisis? It's the government propping up the economy at the moment, not business 'paying 100% for corona virus'. And as for 'not a penny from the public sector', lets wait and see the more familiar side of this government when it comes to who actually pays for the amount of government borrowing going on. Remember austerity? Remember the cuts? And where did all that QE money go? A lot of already rich people got quite a bit richer after the last round of disaster capitalism. I doubt anything has really changed.

    Got to go to work, from home for the time being.
    Last edited by jackd; 12-05-2020 at 08:33 AM.

  3. #723
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Muddy puddle at Temple Newsam
    Posts
    2,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike T View Post
    You must admit Priti Patel is - er - pretty dire. No idea of numbers, and, it would seem, no idea that she has no idea.
    You're referring to when she stumbled over reading the number of people tested at the daily briefing I presume. Embarrassing certainly, but not exactly in the same league as this.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rneBbKrVE7A
    Last edited by Muddy Retriever; 12-05-2020 at 08:34 AM.

  4. #724
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Leeds. Capital of Gods Own.
    Posts
    11,176
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike T View Post
    Unfortunately this Wednesday will change that.
    Why?

    Nothing has really changed.

  5. #725
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Muddy puddle at Temple Newsam
    Posts
    2,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike T View Post
    Yes - estimate - hence the "about", "thought" and "around". Sorry to mix up the experts. The 50,000 deaths is also out of date. We have a long long way to go. Have a guess at how many deaths - I do not think it will be the good side of 250,000.
    On what are you basing your 250,000 forecast? Even Neil Ferguson, who has a track record of inflated estimates only said it would be 250,000 without a lockdown. We have had a lockdown and are still largely in it. If we're still going to have that number of deaths anyway what's the point of continuing with the lockdown at all?

  6. #726
    Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Ambleside
    Posts
    6,160
    50,000 deaths per 3.5 million cases = how many deaths per 35 million cases? We need around 35 million cases to stop the pandemic as a result of herd immunity. It could be said that the deaths up until now have included a lot of the really frail, and that they cannot die twice. But most of the really frail - like most other people, have yet to come into contact with it. I hope I am wrong.

  7. #727
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,130
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike T View Post
    You must admit Priti Patel is - er - pretty dire. No idea of numbers, and, it would seem, no idea that she has no idea.
    She’s in good company then. Your remark fits all the doctors commenting on corona epidemiology just as well. Random number generators would have done better. The only thing they are consistent on , is incessant criticism.

    Take professor “ the swedes will have 50000 deaths if they pursue this lunatic policy” fergusson. Perhaps he broke lockdown to engineer himself the sack!

    Patel deals with 1000 different minutiae on a daily basis across a myriad of departments. Home sec is acknowledged the hardest job of all. Although events have made boris’s job harder. The last thing she needs is a microphone shoved up her nose with gotcha questions. Nobody could answer most of them without prior briefing.

    It’s probably why May coped with it. She was a gifted administrator not a leader.
    To do home sec you need to be a details geek, a completer finisher, and none of them come over well.

    It is easy to criticise for those who don’t have to do it.
    Mike, however it comes across, I’m not critical of the medical profession per se. I just hate All the endless criticism of those with near impossible jobs. And you must admit: medics as a bunch are long on criticism.


    Diane Abbott thought policemen earned £200 a year, and wears two left shoes.
    It could have been worse,
    Last edited by Oracle; 12-05-2020 at 09:24 AM.

  8. #728
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Rhandirmwyn
    Posts
    4,164
    On a positive note of what can be done with a go ahead attitude and probably good management driving a factory, I give you this short report from the Control Techniques factory in Newtown, Powys. Llaniboy will know of it.

    Back in full production with 350 staff in full time work. I like to think it shows that the human brain and a little innovation can overcome problems, but many chose to sit around moaning about the irrelevant rather than getting on with it.

    BBC News - Coronavirus: How to run a factory during a pandemic
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-52624288

  9. #729
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Over Haddon
    Posts
    3,088
    Quote Originally Posted by Muddy Retriever View Post
    You're referring to when she stumbled over reading the number of people tested at the daily briefing I presume. Embarrassing certainly, but not exactly in the same league as this.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rneBbKrVE7A
    Apart from the absolute bollocks spouted by Abbot, the look on Nick Ferrari's face made me smile. He could not believe what he was hearing.
    And fair play to him, he wasn't even asking awkward questions or trying to get stuck into her like he sometimes does.
    Visibility good except in Hill Fog

  10. #730
    Quote Originally Posted by Llani Boy View Post
    And fair play to him, he wasn't even asking awkward questions or trying to get stuck into her like he sometimes does.
    Do you mean like "Tell me Diana, in your quieter moments do you ever think that you might be absolutely useless but only have your position because you and Jeremy were lovers?"?

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •