Well that's a change from "apples and pears"
Thoughts from the towpath:
Hindsight is not 100%.
You can't change the past.
Anecdote is an inadequate basis for decision making.
People making decisions are flawed and if they are politicians corrupted by political self-interest.
There is always a reason for a decision/ action - although it may not be a sound or laudable one. The reason is rarely discovered or revealed or admitted.
Everyone including Governments, plcs,... temper the message to what the recipient will accept. There is no such thing as truth (I recommend the book
Corporate Discourse on the subject - not only because I am thanked in the preface for my insights!).
People often prefer to be given a simple message so they don't have to think or research for themselves and accept responsibility for their own actions. (Think fell runners and navigation!).
It is naive to think that Ministers are really very clever people with huge brains that know far more than ordinary mortals and always make the right decisions - even supposing there is such a thing as the "right" decision - ie "right" for whom?
For the government to issue "guidance" that was equally applicable to rush hour crowds on the London Underground and walkers on the top of Pen y Ghent in a gale, might have been inherently slightly flawed: but then even "Thou Shall Not Kill" is not always applicable.
