Quote Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
I have a habit of dissecting tropes such As “ free movement is good” and showing what a disaster they Are. But I don’t expect readers to take it at face value and most of these things are complicated. I am analytical. It’s how I was trained. Do you really mean you disagree but can’t challenge the reasoning?
Can I ask, politely and sincerely, why free movement is not good? From my rudimentary understanding of capitalism, and from reading Adam Smith, I understand free trade = good. If free trade = good then why doesn't free movement = good?