Quote Originally Posted by Marco View Post
Why should I take the time and trouble to research the issue, when you can't be bothered to read what I have said? This is just a distraction tactic, so you can continue to avoid answering the question I have asked.

For the third time then, which taxes are you going to raise to fund the £48 billion pound cost?
I read what you said. You turned 1.8 billion x 6 in to 48 billion. a Multiple of 4.4.

You aren't Prof Ferguson in disguise are you

Paul Stein of Rolls Royce believes it will be ready to sign up to in 2024, with delivery be end of the decade. I think only gas or coal would be able to do that any quicker.

So it gives us baseload quickly, the cost will reduce per unit allowing for inflation and their figure of £40-60/mWh is better than we currently have, so if inflation pushes that up, it will also push up other options.

Good baseload will help business, tech.... basically all business.

I really don't see any problems.

But I'm open to alternative options looking at the next 5-10 years.