A mouthful of rice is good for a malnourished man. The growing, giving, boiling, chewing , swallowing and metabolising thereof: all good.
For a clinically obese man (who's already had his dinner): all bad.
A chair is good but clearly not if you smash it over an innocent man's head, in which case it is an object to be avoided at all costs by the innocent man. Things and actions are imbued with good and evil depending on circumstances; obviously. However, we can usefully wriggle back out of this blind alley and agree, on a less rareified plane, that food is good, warmth is good, laughter is good etc and that poison, hypothermia, lies are bad. In order to be able to come to agreement we need to be able to agree about a common language in which things are what they seem. Otherwise we are only clearing the stage for an endless debate.
Intrinsic value is a notion that may be a useful pivot in the debate.
You describe it.