Why on earth would you seek to do it again Andy?
Did Bob Graham ever state that he didn't use ropes out of ethical or moral concerns? A genuine question because I don't know. If he didn't state any ethical or moral concerns then perhaps he simply didn't use a rope because (for example)
A) He was a competent climber
B) He and or his helpers couldn't be arsed taking the gear with them or pre-rigging it
Come to think of it, did he intend for his "round" to become a hallowed running challenge? Perhaps he did. perhaps he didn't. I'm not decrying the achievement or questioning it's authenticity...I am however questioning the use of terms such as "moral" and "ethical" in connections with the concerns about the evolution of the event....so maybe he didn't use ropes and put Bolts on broad stand but then he was a walker, not a runner and did his round in tennis shoes, long shorts, and a pyjama jacket..........
The point I am making is that the event has evolved, and u must either accept that or you don't......it seems wrong to accept bits of the evolution and hint that others are "immoral" or "unethical". Because, if you follow such criteria then you must therefore consider the ethical issue of attracting a large number of people from all over the UK to trapse all over the fells creating mass erosion during the summer months in particular........after all erosion's a naturally occuring event







Reply With Quote