Quote Originally Posted by IainR View Post
This is your best one yet.

You are brilliant.

Back in 2008 Scientists actually predicted we may well see no warming for a decade. Google multidecadal oscillation.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7376301.stm

When you've had a read come back and debate that point.

Noone has been quiet. Global warming is happening. We've just been out to Australia which is suffering record drought, tell them there's no change.

Yes those scientists at UEA were wrong, but what youa re trying to do above, taking a snippet of climate/weather from one location and using that as an argument against a global change is ignorant in the extreme.

You've out done yourself there, well done Christopher.

Science has revolutionised our world, from antibiotics, to cancer treatments. It's incredible how we keep making gains in medicine. To call these people 'so called educated' is just idiotic.

You also obviously have no idea how science funding works. BTW how many proposals have you submitted/reviewed/or had funded to speak with such authority on how government cash is gained?

Again an answer would be good.

Yours Dr IainR
You accuse me of taking a snippet of climate/weather from one location and using that as an argument against a global change. Then you cite Australia as an example of global warming!

Global warming means global warming. It does not mean global cooling. You can't have it both ways, although I can see the advantage in trying to make it mean all things to all men.

Science has made life better for us in many ways. That's true, but not all scientists are honourable. Some fix their results to suit the political climate, because they're directly or indirectly dependent on government cash.