Quote Originally Posted by Wheeze View Post
I think with respect to the ballot form it is a classic case of someone too close to the issues drawing up what they honestly thought was a fair document. Believe me, it reads as anything but. Sorry, but there it is.
Simon,

I'll balance the above comment against your unchanging, blinkered antagonism to UKA.

OK?

The Summary Note was deliberately produced by someone NOT on the Sub Committee and therefore NOT "too close to the issues".

It was then modified and finally approved by the full FRA Committee.

Of course 16 + people with a range of backgrounds, experience, individual perspectives, views of UKA & etc could all be wrong...or it may be you just don't like the facts presented.

The ballot paper I received helpfully made it quite clear what the FRA Committee thinks and invited me to vote Yes or No. There was no loaded revolver coercing me to vote in any particular direction. Was there with yours?

Regards,

Graham