Quote Originally Posted by GrahamB View Post
Simon,

I'll balance the above comment against your unchanging, blinkered antagonism to UKA.

OK?

The Summary Note was deliberately produced by someone NOT on the Sub Committee and therefore NOT "too close to the issues".

It was then modified and finally approved by the full FRA Committee.

Of course 16 + people with a range of backgrounds, experience, individual perspectives, views of UKA & etc could all be wrong...or it may be you just don't like the facts presented.

The ballot paper I received helpfully made it quite clear what the FRA Committee thinks and invited me to vote Yes or No. There was no loaded revolver coercing me to vote in any particular direction. Was there with yours?

Regards,

Graham
OK, so I'm unchanging but that is because I have yet to be convinced by any of the arguments put forward in favour of staying affiliated. I have been willing to listen to and debate those arguments...hardly a blinkered approach!

If you cannot see the coercive element in the way the ballot paper was worded then that is your problem, not mine. Did you write it?