Results 1 to 10 of 1441

Thread: New safety rules

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    alwaysinjured
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bigfella View Post
    Why does it always have to be somebodys fault, if its just an accident or an individuals missjudgement why can't it just be left at that. I doubt that there are any statistics to show the accident trends in fell running but surely it is only if there is a significant trend that action needs to be taken.
    Absolutely agree, and so do most fell runners. Trouble is, outsiders are not content to leave it at that. The world seems to have a crushing need to "blame someone", and they will look for any sign of impropriety to do that. So it is important not to make that any easier for them than we absolutely have to, the essential thrust of my previous comments.

    Worse still, the media are very vocal with bad assumptions of what has happened, then silent on the truth. I well remember a rather wet and flooded karrimor, where the countries leading media lined up to tell us how 1000 people were lost and in trouble. Sorry we mean 100, sorry we mean 10. Then almost silent on the eventual truth - that these are hardened fellspeople who got back safely, with one exception I believe that one had slipped in a gully, and needed treatment for a leg injury, which could just as easily have happened to any walker on any day before or since.

    The risk of mortality in a fell race is higher than cycling or driving to the race per hour, by perhaps an order of magnitude, (where is the surprise in that?) but since serious injury cycling per hour is 30 times higher than mortality - I am guessing a statistical case could be made that you are less likely to get serious injury running on fells, than riding to the race by road. (or driving by car, I read an analysis somewhere that said the stats are not that dissimilar per hour).

    I would hazard a guess that the health benefits from regular training in respect of better weight management, diet, aerobic exercise and so on, result in less risk of such as coronary problems or weight related problems than the population as a whole, to the point where the actual mortality rate amongst fell runners is substantially lower than the average population, so are far less of a drain on the nations health resources. I doubt the same papers that print blame stories would ever print that, but it might be a useful stat to wield against the nay sayers.

    Might just do some sums to see whether it is true... Lies, damn lies and statistics.
    Last edited by alwaysinjured; 11-10-2013 at 12:44 PM.

Similar Threads

  1. Safety in solo runs?
    By AJF in forum General Fellrunning Issues
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 07-03-2013, 10:34 AM
  2. Four Safety Pins
    By #bob# in forum Sales and Wants
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-06-2008, 08:51 PM
  3. Rules rant
    By FellMonster in forum General Fellrunning Issues
    Replies: 129
    Last Post: 21-12-2007, 07:58 PM
  4. Board Rules
    By Woodstock in forum General chat!
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 22-06-2007, 03:59 PM
  5. Pub Rules!
    By The Landlord in forum General chat!
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-06-2007, 06:38 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •