Quote Originally Posted by alwaysinjured View Post
Am increasingly concerned by what I understand is UKA view of the recent problems, and disappointed that has not been published since it was in essence a public hearing .

In addition, if as I understand it correctly the coroner explicitly cleared the RO of negligence at the recent inquest, I am left wondering why that (arguably one of the most important issues) was not reported at the time of posting the statement on the main site,. It would I suspect be helpful to those concerned. Perhaps those present can confirm that.

.
After 60+ posts and thousands of words, it is clear that you misunderstand many aspects of the law. An inquest gathers facts, it explicitly is not its role to exonerate or apportion blame; that is for other legal processes to deal with if necessary.
The Cumbria Deputy Coroner has issued a narrative conclusion, and has stated he will be formally writing to the FRA, which is legally required to reply. It is only the court documents that matter. Until this process is complete, it might be prudent to keep quiet.