
Originally Posted by
alwaysinjured
Am increasingly concerned by what I understand is UKA view of the recent problems, and disappointed that has not been published since it was in essence a public hearing .
In addition, if as I understand it correctly the coroner explicitly cleared the RO of negligence at the recent inquest, I am left wondering why that (arguably one of the most important issues) was not reported at the time of posting the statement on the main site,. It would I suspect be helpful to those concerned. Perhaps those present can confirm that.
.