Brexit

[Oracle]

Then google it properly instead. Use Europe as comparison.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Area...pean_countries
England ( as opposed to uk) has one of the highest population densities in europe, other than a few minute states,
It also has one of the biggest increases due to migrancy. So already too high is up 10 percent more.

Now the REAL problem: which is not about absolute density, Even labours unicorn housing pledge cannot keep up with migrants, at the levels of 300-500000 and migrants don't bring houses with them. And most of them seemingly want to live in such as London where there is nowhere left to build, so rents begin to rocket.

That is not sustainable. EU refuses to help address it and verhofstadt is determined to make it worse. I wish people would engage with the real issues. There would be less remainers if they did.

migration is a symptom. Not the problem. The real problem EU also refuses to address which is the inevitable worsening of imbalance because of a currency union without political union.

I googled "countries by population density" The UK is way down in 49th place. So hardly full. There is an "infrastructure" issue but no goverment has the balls to really tackle it by encouraging more dense housing, energy conservation, and force people to use public transport/ more sustainable means of travel. I may be wrong but making the country poorer will only make the problem worse not better.

In my own little town, that is on the edge of the Peak District National Park, a new housing development is just being finished. They are all detatched, it is utter madness.

http://statisticstimes.com/demograph...on-density.php