Quote Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
It would be a constitutional outrage if they held another referendum before enacting the first one, indeed having blocked it as best as they can.
Well your "constitutional outrage" is another's "slightly eyebrow-raising" and, of course, the reason you get so aerated is because you liked the outcome of the referendum.

However setting aside the venality of politicians, the stupidity of the electorate & etc, one could argue that the context of the referendum is rather remote from where we now find ourselves at this point in our island story and a statesman-like decision could be to test the current validity of the referendum?

Obviously you will not agree with that concept because you are as blinkered as May - although somewhat more intemperately apoplectic in your language, whereas for my part I must stop reading biographies of Churchill!