Quote Originally Posted by christopher leigh View Post
Yes tut,tut,tut only the uneducated would fail to agree with me!

The educated people that you talk about are nothing but whimp conformists, who've remembered everything and learnt nothing. They are incapable of taking an idea to it's roots, and deciding whether something is good or evil.

Science has many of such adherents. People who'll fix the data for a bit of extra government cash, whilst propagandising certain notions like global warming.(I've noticed they've been a bit quiet recently, what with all the snow).

Yes it is the so called educated people who have brought this country to its knees, and left the innocent at their mercy.

This is your best one yet.

You are brilliant.

Back in 2008 Scientists actually predicted we may well see no warming for a decade. Google multidecadal oscillation.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7376301.stm

When you've had a read come back and debate that point.

Noone has been quiet. Global warming is happening. We've just been out to Australia which is suffering record drought, tell them there's no change.

Yes those scientists at UEA were wrong, but what youa re trying to do above, taking a snippet of climate/weather from one location and using that as an argument against a global change is ignorant in the extreme.

You've out done yourself there, well done Christopher.

Science has revolutionised our world, from antibiotics, to cancer treatments. It's incredible how we keep making gains in medicine. To call these people 'so called educated' is just idiotic.

You also obviously have no idea how science funding works. BTW how many proposals have you submitted/reviewed/or had funded to speak with such authority on how government cash is gained?

Again an answer would be good.

Yours Dr IainR