Page 19 of 22 FirstFirst ... 91718192021 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 220

Thread: New political party?

  1. #181
    Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Marple, Manchester
    Posts
    2,934
    Quote Originally Posted by Witton Park View Post
    The Tories only resigned on one policy matter. I'm not sure they resigned because of the constant abuse from Rees-Mogg.

    In fact it has been Soubry giving out the abuse to her own rather than taking it from her own.
    I seem to remember Tory remain MPs being called traitors, it's amazing how short people's memory can be.

    A Conservative MEP has come under fire for suggesting that Britain’s Treason Act should be updated to apply to citizens who are “working undemocratically against UK through extreme EU loyalty”.

    and he is not the only one.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...eme-eu-loyalty

    Not to mention all of the nutcase newspaper editors.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...itics-42067386
    Oh yes the mail.
    https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ent...B4UXBugV4u1Yiz
    Last edited by DrPatrickBarry; 28-02-2019 at 05:42 PM.

  2. #182
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734
    I think it’s ok so long as you class them as “Enemies of the people” first.

  3. #183
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,130
    I have two observations.
    First , highlighting or comparing the use of word "traitor" on few occasions, implies a lack of study of just how nasty , vitriolic, relentless, and ubiquitous the language used by militant left has been (and momentum in particular) against allthose MPs it considers "traitors". The word traitor is pleasant in comparison.

    Secondly. The UK is clearly negotiating with an institution intent on doing it harm as confirmed by both the rhetoric, and actions ,of those representing EU which has been shameful. The backstop has disturbing parallels with the annexation of Austria and grants EU powers never granted by any country that was not first the loser of an armed conflict.
    So the EU is more than arguably an "enemy" in dictionary definition. In any war any faction fighting or debilitating our own forces or assisting the enemy is certainly treason. So the language is strong but " traitor" does have some rational justification in the context it was used.

    Quote Originally Posted by DrPatrickBarry View Post
    I seem to remember Tory remain MPs being called traitors, it's amazing how short people's memory can be.

    A Conservative MEP has come under fire for suggesting that Britain’s Treason Act should be updated to apply to citizens who are “working undemocratically against UK through extreme EU loyalty”.

    and he is not the only one.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics...eme-eu-loyalty

    Not to mention all of the nutcase newspaper editors.
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...itics-42067386
    Oh yes the mail.
    https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ent...B4UXBugV4u1Yiz
    Last edited by Oracle; 28-02-2019 at 06:18 PM.

  4. #184
    Moderator noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Western Peak District
    Posts
    6,248
    Quote Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
    I have two observations.
    First , highlighting or comparing the use of word "traitor" on few occasions, implies a lack of study of just how nasty , vitriolic, relentless, and ubiquitous the language used by militant left has been (and momentum in particular) against allthose MPs it considers "traitors". The word traitor is pleasant in comparison.

    Secondly. The UK is clearly negotiating with an institution intent on doing it harm as confirmed by both the rhetoric, and actions ,of those representing EU which has been shameful. The backstop has disturbing parallels with the annexation of Austria and grants EU powers never granted by any country that was not first the loser of an armed conflict.
    So the EU is more than arguably an "enemy" in dictionary definition. In any war any faction fighting or debilitating our own forces or assisting the enemy is certainly treason. So the language is strong but " traitor" does have some rational justification in the context it was used.
    Perspective is a wonderful thing. One person's traitor is another person's hero, just as one person's enemy is another person's ally.

    BTW, I agree the left wing of the labour party is more militant (aggressive, belligerent) than the right wing of the conservative party. But as someone who supports neither of them, I see them as no less extreme.

    Also, I'm starting see how your persona is developing. Maybe I should start a Citizen Smith-style persona to bring some sort of balance.

  5. #185
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    1,130
    I think left and right are overused and imprecise labels which mean only what the author wants them to mean.
    Sections of both main parties are against immigration as a cultural dilution, not just a population size issue. So does that qualify those apparent far left labour heartlands as far right?
    It is also true that the swastika was once the emblem an authoritarian socialist! so tjerefore left? regime. The more I see of Corbyns labour the more I see fascism: that is a centralist autocracy that does not tolerate any dissent, with only the illusion of democracy, and intimidation the method of control. The labels are all messed up.


    Quote Originally Posted by noel View Post
    Perspective is a wonderful thing. One person's traitor is another person's hero, just as one person's enemy is another person's ally.

    BTW, I agree the left wing of the labour party is more militant (aggressive, belligerent) than the right wing of the conservative party. But as someone who supports neither of them, I see them as no less extreme.

    Also, I'm starting see how your persona is developing. Maybe I should start a Citizen Smith-style persona to bring some sort of balance.
    Last edited by Oracle; 28-02-2019 at 06:45 PM.

  6. #186
    Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Muddy puddle at Temple Newsam
    Posts
    2,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Oracle View Post
    It is also true that the swastika was once the emblem an authoritarian socialist! so tjerefore left? regime. The more I see of Corbyns labour the more I see fascism: that is a centralist autocracy that does not tolerate any dissent, with only the illusion of democracy, and intimidation the method of control. The labels are all messed up.
    It's an interesting point, I've often thought that the far left and the far right have much in common. The full name of the Nazis was the National Socialist German Workers Party after all, which sounds pretty lefty to me. Those on the far right are not free martketeers, their views on state ownership are remarkably similar to the left and they display the same intolerance of certain groups. In the case of Corbyn's Labour party it just happens to be Jews. The BNP would approve. In fact when Corbyn's comments about "zionists not understanding English irony" were reported this summer he was commended by the BNP's ex-leader Nick Griffin and the former leader of the Klu Klux Klan. I guess they know a kindred spirit when they see one.
    Last edited by Muddy Retriever; 28-02-2019 at 06:58 PM.

  7. #187
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734
    And Godwin has landed

  8. #188
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734
    that does not tolerate any dissent
    I wish more would remember this sentiment when telling people to shut up and get over it.

  9. #189
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734
    Long description here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

    Short answer, if a “discussion” like this goes on long enough someone inevitably brings the nazis into it.

  10. #190
    Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Tayside
    Posts
    4,734
    We’re basically a couple of pages before we get to direct comparisons between Corbyn, Hitler and probably Stalin.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •